|
[QUE/QFT-05007] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4035pageLet \(\displaystyle N=-\Big(\frac{i\beta\vec{\alpha}\cdot\vec{p} }{2mc}\Big)\, f\Big(\frac{|\vec{p}|}{mc}\Big)\)
- Prove that \begin{equation} \exp(iN) = \cos\big(\frac{|\vec{p}|f}{2mc} \big) + \frac{\beta\vec{\alpha}\cdot\vec{p}}{|\vec{p}|} \sin \big(\frac{|\vec{p}|f}{2mc} \big), \end{equation} where \(H\) is Dirac Hamiltonian \(H=c\vec{\alpha}.\cdot\vec{p} + \beta mc^2\)
- Find the real function \(f\) such that \begin{equation} H{'} = e^{iN} H e^{-iN} \end{equation} is free of operators odd operators. For this choice of \(f\) \[ H{'} = \beta c \sqrt{|\vec{p}|^2 + m^2c^2}.\]
|
|
22-02-04 08:02:19 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05006] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4034pageFor a free complex Klein Gordon field find the unequal time commutator as \[ \big[\phi(x), \phi(y)\big] = i\Delta(x-y)\] and express your answer for \(\Delta(x)\) as an integral of the form \[\int dq e^{-iqx} \delta(q^2-\mu^2) \epsilon(q_0) \] You need not compute the integral.
- Argue that the function \(\Delta(x)\) is odd under change of sign of \(x\) and that it is Lorentz invariant.
- For spacelike \(x\) show that there exists a Lorentz frame such that \(x^\prime =-x\). Hence prove that the function \(\Delta(x)\) vanishes for space like \(x\).
|
|
22-02-04 08:02:38 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05005] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4350page$\newcommand{\matrixelement}[3]{\langle#1|#2|#3\rangle}\newcommand{\dd}[2][]{\frac{d#1}{d#2}}${}$\newcommand{\pp}[2][]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}${}$\newcommand{\ket}[1]{|#1\rangle}$ {} $\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1|}$ For a real free Klein Gordon field, mass \(m\), compute \[ \matrixelement{0}{\phi(x)\phi(y)}{\vec{k}, \vec{q}}\] and show that the result is properly symmetrized wave function for two identical bosons with momenta \(\vec{q},\vec{p}\). Here \(\ket{\vec{k}, \vec{q}}\) is the state with two bosons with momenta \(\vec{k}, \vec{q}\). |
|
22-02-02 20:02:12 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05004] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4349pageExpress the field momentum \begin{equation*} P^k = \int d^3x \big( \pi(x) \partial^k \phi(x) + \pi^*(x)\partial^k \phi(x)^*\big) \end{equation*} in terms of creation and annihilation operators. |
|
22-02-02 20:02:34 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05003] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4348pageProve that the free particle solutions \(f_q(x)\) obey the orthononality relations \begin{eqnarray} i \int d^3x f_q^*(x) \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_0 f_p(x) = 2\omega_q\delta(\vec{q}-\vec{p}).\nonumber \end{eqnarray} and find the value of \( \int d^3x f_q(x) \overleftrightarrow{\partial}_0 f_p(x)\). |
|
22-02-02 20:02:18 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05001] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4346page
- Starting from the Lagrangian for a complex scalar field obtain the Hamiltonian for a free complex Klein Gordon field.
- Write ETCR and for the quantized field prove that \begin{equation}\label{EQ01} \big[H, \pi(x)\big] = - i \big( \nabla^2- \mu^2\big) \phi^*(x) . \end{equation}
- Does relation,\eqRef{EQ01}, hold only as equal time commutator or for \(H\) and \(\pi(x)\) at arbitrary different times ? Explain your answer.
- Use \EqRef{EQ01} to derive the usual Euler Lagrange equation of motion for the complex scalar field.
|
|
22-02-02 19:02:29 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-05002] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4347pageStarting from the Lagrangian for a complex scalar field obtain the Hamiltonian for a free complex Klein Gordon field. and show that quantized field obeys \begin{equation}\label{eq01} \big[H, \pi(x)\big] = - i \big( \nabla^2- \mu^2\big) \phi^*(x) . \end{equation} |
|
22-02-02 19:02:39 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-11006] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4053pageThe Feynman propagator for Klein Gordon field corresponds to \(i\epsilon\) prescription as given below $$ \Delta_F(x-y) = \int d^4k {\exp(ikx)\over k^2-m^2+2i\epsilon k_0}~~,~~\epsilon>0 $$
- [(a)] Show the poles of the integrand in complex $k_0$ plane for $\epsilon>0$.
- [(b)] Evaluate the $k_0$ integral and write your answer for the Feynman propagator as integrals overs space components of momentum $k=(k_0\vec{k})$
|
|
22-02-02 19:02:10 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-11002] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4049page$\newcommand{\matrixelement}[3]{\langle#1|#2|#3\rangle}\newcommand{\dd}[2][]{\frac{d#1}{d#2}}${}$\newcommand{\pp}[2][]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}${}$\newcommand{\ket}[1]{|#1\rangle}$ {} $\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1|}$
Let \(\Delta_F(x-y)\) be defined in terms of the commutator by \[i \Delta^{(\pm)}(x-y)=\big[\phi^{(\pm)}(x),\phi(y)^{(\mp)}\big]\] where \(\phi(x)\) is quantized free scalar field, Let \(\Delta^\text{ret}(x-y), \Delta^\text{adv}(x-y)\) and be the retarded, advanced Green functions \[\Delta^\text{ret}(x-y)= \Delta^{(+)}(x-y)\theta(x_0-y_0)\] \[\Delta^\text{adv}(x-y)= -\Delta^{(-)}(x-y)\theta(y_0-x_0)\] and \(\Delta_F(x-y)\) be the Feynman propagator defined by \[\Delta_F(x-y) =\matrixelement{0}{T\big(\phi(x)\phi(y)}{0}\big)\]
- Show that \begin{eqnarray} \Delta^{(+)}&=&\matrixelement{0}{\phi(x)\phi(y)}{0}\\ \Delta^{(-)}&=&\matrixelement{0}{\phi(y)\phi(x)}{0} \end{eqnarray}
- Show that \begin{eqnarray} \Delta_F(x)&=&\Delta^\text{ret}(x) -\Delta^\text{adv}(x-y)\\ \end{eqnarray}
- Show that all the three functions, \(\Delta^\text{ret}, \Delta^\text{adv}\) and \(\Delta_F\) obey the equation \[ (\Box + m^2)G(x-y)=-\delta^{(4)}(x-y)\] for Green function for the Klein Gordon field.
|
|
22-02-02 19:02:19 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-11001] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4048page$\newcommand{\matrixelement}[3]{\langle#1|#2|#3\rangle}\newcommand{\dd}[2][]{\frac{d#1}{d#2}}${}$\newcommand{\pp}[2][]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}}$ $\newcommand{\ket}[1]{|#1\rangle}$ $\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1|}$
For a quantized real scalar field \(\phi(x)\), define functions \(i\Delta^{(\pm)}(x-y)\) defined by \begin{eqnarray} i\Delta^{(+)}(x-y) &=& \matrixelement{0}{\phi(x)\,\phi(y)}{0} \\ i\Delta^{(-)}(x-y) &=& - \matrixelement{0}{\phi(y)\,\phi(x)}{0}. \end{eqnarray} Use \(\phi^{(\pm)}(x)\) to denote positive and negative frequency parts of the scalar field \(\phi(x)\). Show that
- \(\Delta^{(\pm)}(x-y)\) are real.
- \(\Delta^{(+)}(x-y) = \matrixelement{0}{\big[\phi^{(+)}(x)\,,\,\phi^{(-)}(y)\big]}{0}\) \\ \(\Delta^{(-)}(x-y) = - \matrixelement{0}{\big[\phi^{(-)}(x)\,,\,\phi^{(+)}(y)\big]}{0}\).
- The Feynman propagator \(\Delta_F\) is defined as the vacuum expectation value of time ordered product of fields: \[ \Delta_F(x-y) = \matrixelement{0}{T\big(\phi(x)\phi(y)\big)}{0}.\] Show that the Feynman propagator satisfies the equation \[ (\Box + M^2) \Delta_F(x-y)= - \delta^{(4)}(x-y).\]
Hint Write \(\Delta_F(x-y)\) as \[\Delta_F(x-y)= \Delta^{(+)}(x-y)\theta(x_0-y_0) - \Delta^{(-)}(x-y)\theta(y_0-x_0).\] |
|
22-02-02 19:02:14 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-11003] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4050page
Let \(\Delta^\text{ret}(x-y), \Delta^\text{adv}(x-y), \Delta_F(x-y)\) and be the retarded, advanced Green functions and Feynman propagator respectively. Using Fourier transform, the three Green functions can be written as contour integral \[\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\oint_C \frac{d^4k e^{ik(x-y)}}{(k^2-m^2)}\] The \(k_0\) integral is the first integral to be evaluated by the method of contour integration in complex \(k_0\) plane. The point marked on the real line are the poles of the integrand at \(k_0=\pm\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2}\). Four contours are shown in the figure below. These contours are to be suitably closed to form the contour \(C\) for evaluation of the Green function. Identify the contours corresponding to each of the three the advanced, retarded and Feynman propagators. \\ \FigBelow{10,10}{120}{30}{FourContours}{} Give brief reasons in support of your answer. In each case draw the closed contour \(C\).
A Quick Answer is given separately. See scan of hand written sheets. Detailed explanation of essential points of the solution is given below.
Main Steps in Solution :: Some details In this problem \(k_0\) integration is to be carried out using the method of contour integration in complex plane. I will explain and write the solution in several steps. Write out the expression in full glory.
The integral to be evaluated, apart from an overall constant is \begin{equation} \int d^3k \int_{-\infty}^\infty dk_0 \frac{e^{ik_0x^0- \vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}}{k_0^2- \omega^2}, \qquad \omega\equiv +\sqrt{\ \vec{k}^2-m^2}. \end{equation}
Stare at the expression
First of all it is an improper integral because the lower limit is \(-\infty\) and upper limit is \(+\infty\). An integral where one, or both, the limits go to infinity,is an {\it improper integral}.
An integral is also an improper integral the function becomes infinite at one or more points in the range of integration. The improper integrals are defined through a limiting procedure. Sometimes an improper integrals can be given well defined, unique, meaning though a limiting procedure. In such a case we say that the integral exists as an improper integral. For example \(\int_0^1\frac{dx}{\sqrt{x}}\) is a well defined improper integral and has a value \(\sqrt{2}\). In general \(\int_0^1 \frac{dx}{x^c}\) exists when \(-1<c<0\). For positive \(c\) there is the integral exists and no problem any way. An integral which does not exist as a improper integral, is a singular integral. The given integral is a singular integral. The integrand blows up at \(k_0=\pm\omega\) and these points fall inside the range of integration. As a result the integral is does not exist. Also that the answer depends on how we handle the integral. } In general there will be several ways of defining a singular integral by prescribing a method of avoiding the singularity.
Remember any such method will be one definition and different methods will give different answers.
One such method is use contour integration in complex plane. Given integral as contour integral in complex
\(k_0\) plane.} Any real integral \(\int_a^b f(x) dx\) can be trivially written as a an integral in complex plane \begin{equation} \int_a^b f(x) dx = \int_\gamma f(z) dz \end{equation} where \(\gamma\) is real line interval from \(a\) to \(b\). So we write our given integral as \begin{equation} \int_\gamma dk_0 \frac{e^{ik_0x^0 - \vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}}{k_0^2-\omega^2} \end{equation} where the contour \(\gamma\), in complex \(k_0\)plane, is to be chosen so as to avoid the singularity.
Statement of the problem
In the given problem some choices are shown, there are many more possibilities. Also do remember that infinite contours are to be handled by suitable limiting procedure. If we choose one of the four contours and try to evaluate the integral, we shall get well defined answer.{\tt of course different answers for different cases.
Choose any one of the four contour
Suppose we have chosen one of four contours, we can compute the \(k_0\)
integral. This is done by making use of Cauchy residue theorem. That requires us to close the contour first before we apply residue theorem. In this problem we first truncate the given contour from \(-R \) to \(+R\) and take the limit \(R\to\infty\) at the end.
Next we add a semicircle of radius \(R\) with centre at the origin. We can do this in two ways. Take the semi-circle in upper half plane or lower half plane. Having closed the contour by choosing semicircle one way or other, we then apply the residue theorem.
Which semi-circle?
In this class of problems with exponentials, the choice of contour is dictated by the argument of the exponential which in our case is \(ik_0x^0\) and and \(k_0\) is complex. So let us write it as a sum of real and imaginary parts \(k_0=k_1+i k_2\).
Case I :: Assume \(x_0>0\)\\} Then we get \begin{equation} \exp(ik_0 x^0)= \exp( ik_1x_0 - k_2x_0). \end{equation} {As \(R\to\infty\), \(k_2\to \infty\) in the upper half plane and the exponential will go to zero, because \(k_2\) is positive. } So will the integral along the semicircle go to zero as \(R\to \infty\) Case II :: Assume \(x_0<0\)\\} Then we get \begin{equation} \exp(ik_0 x^0)= \exp( ik_1x_0 - k_2x_0)=\exp( ik_1x_0 + k_2|x_0|) . \end{equation}
As \(R\to\infty\), \(k_2\to \infty\) in the lower half plane \(k_2\) negative and large. Therefore the exponential will go to zero. So will the integral along the semicircle go to zero as \(R\to \infty\)
|
|
22-02-02 19:02:33 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-12015] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4055page$\newcommand{\Msc}{\mathscr M}$ For a decay process \(A (q) \to B(p) + C(\ell)\), where \(A\) and \(B\) are spin \(1/2\) fermions and \(C\) is a spin zero particle, the transition amplitude involves matrix element of the form \begin{equation} \Msc = \bar{u}^{(r)}_B(p)\big(g - g{'}\gamma_5\big) u^{(s)}_A(q) \end{equation} where \(u_B, u_A\) etc are Dirac spinors for the particles \(B\) and \(A\). We need to take absolute square of the matrix element and sum over all spins. Taking the adjoint, \(\dagger\), carefully gives the complex conjugate of \(\Msc\) \begin{eqnarray} \Msc^* &=& \{\bar{u}^{(r)}_B(p)\big(g - g{'}\gamma_5\big) u^{(s)}_A(q)\}^\dagger \\ &=& \{{u}^{(r)\dagger}_B(p)\gamma_0\big(g - g{'}\gamma_5\big) u^{(s)}_A(q)\}^\dagger\\ &=& \{{u}^{(s)\dagger}_A(q)\big(g^* - g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\big) \gamma_0 u^{(r)}_B(p)\} \\ &=& \{\bar{u}^{(s)}_A(q)\gamma_0\big(g^* - g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\big) \gamma_0 u^{(r)}_B(q)\}\\ &=& \{\bar{u}^{(s)}_A(q)\big(g^* + g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\big) u^{(r)}_B(p)\} \end{eqnarray}
Therefore, the absolute square is given by \begin{eqnarray} \sum_{r,s} |\Msc|^2 &=& \Msc^* \Msc\\ &=& \sum_{r,s} \{\bar{u}^{(s)}_A(q)\big(g^* + g^{{'} *}\gamma_5\big) u^{(r)}_B(p) \} \times \big\{\bar{u}^{(r)}_B(p)\big(g - g{'}\gamma_5\big) u^{(s)}_A(q) \big\} \end{eqnarray}
Using projection operators, \begin{equation} \sum_r u^{(r)}(k) \bar{u}^{(r)}(k) = \frac{n\!\!\!{k}+ M }{2M} \end{equation} this expression can be written as trace of gamma matrices. To see this we write \(\Msc\) and \(\Msc^*\) terms explicitly in terms of Dirac indices as \begin{eqnarray} \Msc &=&\sum_{\alpha\beta} [\bar{u}^{(r)}_B(p)]_\alpha\,[\big(g -g{'}\gamma_5]_{\alpha\beta}\, [u^{(s)}_A(q)]_\beta\\ \Msc^*&=& \sum_{\sigma\rho}[\bar{u}^{(s)}_A(q)]_\sigma\,[\big(g^* + g^{{'}^*}\gamma_5\big)]_{\sigma\rho}\, [u^{(r)}_B(p)]_\rho \end{eqnarray}
Therefore \(|\Msc|^2\), summed over all spins becomes \begin{eqnarray} \sum_{r,s} |\Msc|^2 &=& \sum_{r,s}\sum_{\alpha\beta\sigma \rho} [\bar{u}^{(r)}_B(p)]_\alpha\,[\big(g-g{'}\gamma_5]_{\alpha\beta}\, [u^{(s)}_A(q)]_\beta [\bar{u}^{(s)}_A(q)]_\sigma\,[\big(g^* + g^{{'}^*}\gamma_5\big)]_{\sigma\rho}\, [u^{(r)}_B(p)]_\rho \end{eqnarray}
Now put \(u^{(r)}_A(p) \bar{u}^{(r)}_A(p)\) terms next to each other to get and use projection operators and complete spin sums over \(r,s\) \begin{eqnarray} {\sum_{rs}|\Msc^2|} &=& \sum_{r,s}\sum_{\alpha\beta\sigma \rho} \Big(u^{(r)}_{B\rho}(p) \bar{u}^{(r)}_{B\alpha}(p)\Big)\,[\big(g -g{'}\gamma_5)]_{\alpha\beta} \times \Big( u^{(s)}_{A\beta}(q) \bar{u}^{(s)}_{A\sigma} (Q)\Big) \,[\big(g^* + g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\big)]_{\sigma\rho}\\ &=& \sum_{\alpha\beta\sigma\rho} \left(\frac{n\!\!\!{p}+ M_B}{2M_B}\right)_{\rho\alpha} \Big(g -g{'}\gamma_5\Big)_{\alpha\beta}\, \left(\frac{n\!\!\!{q}+M_A}{2M_A}\right)_{\beta\sigma}\,\Big(g^* + g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\Big)_{\sigma\rho}\\ &=& \text{tr}\left\{\Big(\frac{n\!\!\!{p}+ M_B}{2M_B}\Big) \Big(g -g{'}\gamma_5\Big)\, \Big(\frac{n\!\!\!{q}+M_A}{2M_A}\Big)\Big(g^* + g^{{'}*}\gamma_5\Big)\right\} \end{eqnarray} Thus problem of squaring the matrix element and summing over all spins has been reduced to computing trace of products of gamma matrices. \paragraph*{Question for You} Derive an general formula for spin sums taking \(|\Msc|^2\) to be of the form \begin{equation} \Msc= \bar{u}^{(s)}_B(p) \, \Gamma \, u^{(r)}_A(q) \end{equation} where \(\Gamma\) is an expression involving Dirac \(\gamma\) matrices. \paragraph*{Note} With this preparation you are now ready to compute life times and cross sections for processes involving fermions. \noindent Please go through the attached scan of computation of lifetime of \\ \(\Lambda^0 \to p + \pi^-\). \noindent Check all steps and factors carefully. Let me know if I have missed anything. |
|
22-02-02 19:02:21 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-12004] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4054pageThe original four fermion interaction for beta decay of neutron \[n \longrightarrow p + e^- + \bar{\nu} \] is of the of form \[ \bar{\psi}_p(x)\gamma_\mu\psi_n(x) \bar{\psi}_e(x) \gamma^\mu \psi_\nu(x) + h.c.\] Now consider other processes given below. Which of these processes (real or virtual) are permitted and which ones are not permitted by the above interaction in the first order?
- \( \bar{p} \longrightarrow \bar{n} + e^- +\bar{\nu} \);
- \( \bar{p} \longrightarrow \bar{n} + e^- +\nu \);
- \( n \longrightarrow p + e^+ + \nu \);
- \( p \longrightarrow n + e^+ + \bar{\nu} \);
- \( \bar{n} \longrightarrow \bar{p} + e^+ + \nu \);
- \( \bar{n} \longrightarrow \bar{p} + e^+ + \bar{\nu} \).
Give brief reason in each case. |
|
22-02-02 19:02:54 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-13003] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4058page |
|
22-02-01 19:02:38 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-13002] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4057page
- Use Wick's theorem to reduce the following time ordered product to a sum of normal products. \[T\big(:\bar{\psi}(x) \gamma_5\psi(x) \phi(x):\ :\bar{\psi}(y)\gamma_5\psi(y) \phi(y):\big)\] where \(\psi(x),\phi(x)\) represent spin half(nucleon) and spin zero (pion) fields respectively.
- Identify terms that will contribute to pion nucleon scattering.
- Find term(s),if any, that will contribute to pion pion scattering?Are there terms which contribute to nucleon anti nucleon annihilation into two pions? Identify these terms?
- Draw position space Feynman diagrams for the processes mentioned in parts (b) and (c).
|
|
22-02-01 19:02:30 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-13001] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4056page$\newcommand{\matrixelement}[3]{\langle#1|#2|#3\rangle}$ Use Wick's theorem to evaluate the following free field time ordered operator product \[T\big(:\phi^4(x):\ :\phi^4(y):\big)\] and write it as a sum of normal ordered products and in terms of \(\Delta(x-y)=\matrixelement{0}{T(\phi(x)\phi(y))}{0}\). Which term(s), if any, will contribute to \(\pi-\pi\) scattering, if the field \(\phi(x)\) represents neutral pion field. |
|
22-02-01 19:02:08 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-14002] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4386pageThe original four fermion interaction for beta decay of neutron \[n \longrightarrow p + e^- + \bar{\nu} \] is of the of form \[ \big(\bar{\psi}_p(x)\gamma_\mu\psi_n(x)\big)\big( \bar{\psi}_\nu(x) \gamma^\mu \psi_e(x)\big) + h.c.\] Now consider other processes given below. Which of these processes (real or virtual) are permitted and which ones are not permitted by the above interaction in the first order? Give brief reason in each case.
- \( \bar{p} \longrightarrow \bar{n} + e^- +\bar{\nu} \);
- \( \bar{p} \longrightarrow \bar{n} + e^- +\nu \);
- \( n \longrightarrow p + e^+ + \nu \);
- \( p \longrightarrow n + e^+ + \bar{\nu} \);
- \( \bar{n} \longrightarrow \bar{p} + e^+ + \nu \);
- \( \bar{n} \longrightarrow \bar{p} + e^+ + \bar{\nu} \).
|
|
22-02-01 19:02:28 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-14004] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4388pageFor \(\phi^4\)theory draw all one loop Feynman diagrams for four point function. |
|
22-02-01 19:02:53 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-14003] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4062page$\newcommand{\matrixelement}[3]{\langle#1|#2|#3\rangle}$ $\newcommand{\Lsc}{\mathscr{L}}$ For a self coupled scalar theory with interaction Lagrangian density given by \begin{equation} \Lsc_{\text{int}}= \frac{\lambda}{3!}:\phi(x)^3: \end{equation} Compute \begin{eqnarray} \int d^4y_1 \int d^4y_2\matrixelement{0}{T(\phi(x_1)\phi(x_2) \Lsc(y_1) \Lsc(y_2)}{0} \end{eqnarray} |
|
22-02-01 19:02:34 |
n |
|
[QUE/QFT-14001] QFT-PROBLEMNode id: 4385pageProve that \begin{equation} \int_{t_0}^ t \, dt_1 \int_{t_0}^ {t_1} dt_2\, H^\prime_I(t_1) H^\prime_I(t_2) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{t_0}^ t \, dt_1 \int_{t_0}^ t \, dt_2 T\big( H^\prime_I(t_1) H^\prime_I(t_2)\big) \end{equation} |
|
22-02-01 19:02:07 |
n |